"Were those policies
(which now govern hiring of county school system
superintendents) imposed on two or
four-year colleges, a Joe Grimsley would never have been
considered to head-up Richmond Community College. A Bill
Friday would never have led the UNC system to national
prominence. A Terry Sanford would never have contributed to
making Duke University the highly regarded university it is
today."
--
from a letter to legislators by Phil Kirk and Mike
Ward
recommending passage of S. 378 |
NCCBI
gains major legislative victory with passage of bill
giving school boards more flexibility in hiring
superintendents
NCCBI achieved one of its major goals for
this legislative session when the House on Wednesday gave
final approval to legislation that empowers local school
boards with the
flexibility to hire as superintendents individuals who
are otherwise well qualified but who don’t have classroom
experience or a college degree in education. Current state law
says a person must have a degree in education and possess
other credentials, requirements that disqualify many talented
people from the business and financial worlds from working in
the schools.
The proposal drew extensive debate and stiff opposition from
the N.C. Association of Education, which warned
legislators their vote on the bill, S. 378 Degree Not
Required/Local Superintendent, would be its “first
report card issue” of the session. Despite that pressure,
the House passed the bill on second-reading Tuesday by a vote
of 79-34 and it received third-reading approval Wednesday by a
vote of 81-34.
A minor amendment was added during House debate that
directs the State Board of Education to establish minimum
credentials, education pre-requisites and relevant experience
for local superintendents. But those
minimum qualifications cannot include an education degree or
certification. Because of the amendment, the bill goes back to the Senate for
concurrence.
The issue is a top priority for the NCCBI Education
Committee, chaired by Clark Plexico, and received bipartisan
support on the Senate and House floors. The bill was sponsored
by Sen. Howard Lee (D-Orange) and was presented on the House
floor by Rep. Carolyn Russell (R-Wayne).
“This is a major victory for local school districts who
will be able to hire the best person who can most effectively
lead their school systems,” said NCCBI President Phil Kirk.
“Our children deserve leadership that is derived from
managerial experience. A person does not have to have an
education degree to gain that administrative background.”
Kirk and John Dornan, executive director of the Public School
Forum, co-signed a letter to House members that pointed to the
state’s community college system and university system,
which have the authority to hire leaders outside the education
arena.
“Of our three systems of education, the university system,
the community college system and the K-12 system, only K-12 is
a `closed shop’ in that certification is required for school
superintendents,” the letter states. “Unlike our community college system or UNC system,
local school boards cannot consider any candidate based solely
on their leadership skills, their managerial abilities of
their record of producing high quality results. Instead, local
school boards are confined to look for leadership from within
the system.” The full text of the letter is reprinted
below.
“We greatly appreciate the leadership of Sen. Lee and Rep.
Russell on this important issue,” Kirk said. “They have
spent a significant amount of time providing information about
the implications of this bill, and their hard work has made a
difference for public education in North Carolina.”

Text of the Letter
TO: N.C. House of Representatives
FROM:
Phillip
J. Kirk, Jr., President, NCCBI; John Dornan, Executive Director, Public
School Forum
DATE: May 22, 2001
RE: SB 378 – Education Degree Not Required/Local
Superintendent
Today, SB 378 Education Degree Not
Required/Local Superintendent is expected to be on the House
calendar for action. The proposed legislation, which won
approval in the Senate by a 47-1 margin, would allow local
school boards to consider candidates for local
superintendents, regardless of whether they have come through
traditional required channels (i.e. served as principals,
completed required college course work, etc.) or not.
Two factors argue strongly in favor of this
proposal. First, of our three systems of education, the
university system, the community college system and the K-12
system, only K-12 is a “closed shop” in that certification
is required for school superintendents. Unlike our community
college system or UNC system, local school boards cannot
consider any candidate based solely on their leadership
skills, their managerial abilities or their record of
producing high quality results. Instead, local school boards are confined to look for
leadership from within the system.
Were those policies imposed on two or
four-year colleges, a Joe Grimsley would never have been
considered to head-up Richmond Community College. A Bill
Friday would never have led the UNC system to national
prominence. A Terry Sanford would never have contributed to
making Duke University the highly regarded university it is
today. The same logic would have prevented former governors
like Dick Riley or Lamar Alexander from being named
secretaries of Education for the United States. It would have
prevented former governor Roy Roemer from serving as the
superintendent of the Los Angeles County schools.
Second, the state is investing billions of
dollars in K-12 schools in an effort to find answers to
seemingly intractable problems – such as large performance
gaps between students of different races or family income
brackets and high dropout rates – but our certification
requirements prevent schools from looking out of the K-12
community for new answers, for different approaches, for
results-driven leaders out of the education mold.
We believe it is time to give local school boards
the same flexibility that governing boards of our two and four
year colleges have. It
is time to open the door and allow fresh ideas and different
styles of leadership into our schools. We urge you to give SB 378 your support.
Return to Page One
|